
Why is it that most career politicians in Washington are lawyers, yet local politicians come from all walks of life? It seems many of these career politicians who are lawyers never worked as attorneys after graduating from law school.
They started running for office immediately after getting their diplomas. There’s something fishy here, and I can’t quite put my thumb on it, or is that finger?
Another puzzling thing regarding law is why are some legal terms impossible to understand? Habeas corpus is one such definition. I had to seek help in understanding it, and even that didn’t totally help.
Habeas corpus is a legal writ requiring said person under arrest to be brought before the court or before a judge, especially to secure said person’s release unless lawful grounds are shown for their detention.
That’s all fine, but further confusion is added to the fire by the use of the words writ and said. More clarification is needed here before the full meaning of Habeas corpus becomes crystal clear to me, which never happens.
When I think of writ, Washington-Rats-In-Training comes to mind, then a Rooster Cogburn line from “True Grit.” In this 1968 Western movie, Rooster Cogburn (John Wayne) corners a giant rat in a Chinese restaurant while telling the cornmeal thieving creature in legal jargon,
“Mister Rat, I have a writ here says you’re to stop eatin’ Chin Lee’s cornmeal forthwith. It’s a rat writ, writ for a rat, and this is lawful service of the same.”
My online dictionary says that a writ is a formal written order issued by a court or other legal authority. It commands the said recipient to perform or refrain from performing a specific act. Writs are commonly used in legal proceedings to enforce rights, ensure compliance with the law, or provide remedies for said individuals.
The word “said” is used frequently in legal documents to refer back to a person, item, or concept already mentioned earlier in the text. This repetition helps maintain clarity and precision, ensuring there is no ambiguity about what or whom the document is referencing.
It’s a traditional style rooted in legal writing that aims to avoid confusion, though for most people, it can sound overly formal, sometimes redundant, and confusing.
Based on the bewildering language alone, it appears that some politicians study law before running for Washington, DC, positions so they are well prepared to write hocus-pocus bills aimed at confusing constituents like you and me. These are the real writ rats of our society.
Former President Bill Clinton enters the picture after he skillfully decimated the word “is” while undergoing grand jury testimony for his supposed sexual misconduct with Monica Lewinsky. Clinton used semantics to perfection, even though most Americans knew he was guilty of wrongdoing.
I’ll stop short by saying that not all Washington politicians are bad apples. There are good and honest people in the office, but it seems that the majority don’t wear the same shoes. It appears the bulk of those wrongdoers are habitual liars. To me, there’s nothing worse than a lying, writ-rat politician holding public office.
Perhaps the time’s right for someone to have them arrested and to issue Habeas corpus, so that we, the people, can see them try to wiggle their way out of trouble, as Bill Clinton did. That will be more entertaining to watch than the halftime show at our last Super Bowl.
Those politicians who are successful will be recipients of the prestigious Writ Rat Award. I’m told by unreliable sources that Bill Clinton proudly displayed his on the fireplace mantle before Hillary angrily tossed it in the can. Thankfully, ‘Slick Willy’ fished it out, and the trophy is now kept in a safe place known only to him and Chelsea.


















