
I have my own definitions of people who have and lack common sense. Rather than open up a hornet’s nest or offend someone, I elected to let Miss Purdy, my AI assistant, give her thoughts on the subject. Miss Purdy generally goes the politically correct route on her opinions, so it’ll be interesting to see her take here.
“Common sense refers to the basic ability to perceive, understand, and judge things that are shared by nearly all people without the need for specialized knowledge or training. It involves practical reasoning and sound judgment in everyday situations, helping individuals make decisions that are generally considered reasonable and prudent.
While common sense is generally shared by most people, individuals differ in how they apply it. These variations can stem from factors such as upbringing, education, cultural background, personal experiences, and even personality traits.
For example, someone with more exposure to practical situations may develop stronger common sense, while others may rely more on theoretical knowledge or lack experience in certain contexts.
Imagine that someone notices a wet floor and immediately chooses to walk around it to avoid slipping. This decision reflects common sense because it demonstrates practical awareness of potential danger and a straightforward solution to prevent harm.
Another example of common sense in action is when a person notices dark clouds gathering and decides to bring an umbrella before leaving the house. This simple decision demonstrates practical awareness and anticipation of likely rain, helping them stay dry and avoid discomfort during their day.
On the other hand, there are situations where a lack of common sense is evident. For instance, if someone sees a “wet floor” sign but ignores it and walks through the area anyway, risking a fall, this demonstrates a failure to use practical judgment.
Another example would be leaving perishable food out of the refrigerator for hours, despite knowing it could spoil, which shows a disregard for basic reasoning about safety and health.
Interfering with a policeman while he attempts to make an arrest would not be considered using common sense. Such actions can put both yourself and others at risk, escalate the situation, and potentially result in legal consequences.
Common sense would suggest observing from a safe distance or seeking help if necessary, rather than intervening in a way that could disrupt law enforcement and create further problems.
A lack of common sense in voting might be seen when someone casts their ballot without reading or understanding the candidates’ positions or the issues at stake, failing to know the candidates’ political platforms, or simply choosing names at random.
Another instance is when a person votes multiple times in the same election, either not realizing it’s illegal or ignoring the rules altogether, which undermines the integrity of the process. Additionally, some might share their ballots or voting choices publicly in places where it’s prohibited, not considering the possible consequences for themselves or others.
Allowing people to vote without proper identification would generally not be considered common sense. Common sense typically involves ensuring that voting procedures are secure, fair, and transparent, which includes verifying voters’ identities to prevent fraud and uphold the integrity of the election process.
Skipping this step could increase the risk of illegal or duplicate voting, undermining trust in the outcome and the democratic process as a whole. This could ultimately lead to political unrest.
Allowing people to cross the US border without following the established rules for citizenship would generally not be considered common sense. In this case, common sense involves practical reasoning and sound judgment, especially when it comes to laws and public safety.
Ignoring or bypassing legal procedures for border control and citizenship can pose security risks, undermine the rule of law, and complicate resource management and community well-being. Therefore, politicians who uphold and enforce these rules are typically seen as applying common sense to protect their country’s and its citizens’ interests.
Voting for politicians who support allowing people to cross into the country illegally would generally not be considered common sense, based on the context provided. Common sense, as mentioned before, involves using practical reasoning and sound judgment, particularly when it comes to following laws and protecting public safety.
Ignoring legal procedures for border control can lead to security and resource challenges, so supporting such actions through voting would not align with the principles of common sense as described above.
This article discusses the importance of common sense in situations involving law enforcement, voting, and border control. It emphasizes that interfering with police, voting without understanding the issues, or bypassing legal procedures for citizenship and voting are actions lacking in common sense.
The text highlights that common sense involves practical reasoning, following laws, and ensuring security and integrity in public processes to protect both individuals and society as a whole.”
I thank Miss Purdy for her honesty here. Some might say that she was “coached” to respond the way she did, but they’d be gravely mistaken. On the back bumper of her imaginary, red BMW 320i is a bumper sticker that says: HARRIS – WALZ – 2024.
The woman definitely wasn’t inclined to follow the lead of the head donkey and not think for herself, like so many do. Without hesitation, I’ll say that Miss Purdy, regardless of her political affiliation, has common sense and uses it well.



















